ProtectLangdon
Consultation extended: comments by midnight on Thurrock’s draft Local Plan · Policy SS18

Thurrock’s draft Local Plan

STOP Lower Langdon 5,000 homes!

Protect Langdon Ridge Site of Special Scientific Interest

Thurrock Council’s draft Local Plan proposes a new town of 5,000 homes on 250 hectares of Green Belt north of the A13, directly below Langdon Ridge Site of Special Scientific Interest.

Sign up for updates
Campaign map showing Lower Langdon, 4,000 homes, and Corringham Park Farm, 1,000 homes, in red south of Langdon Ridge Site of Special Scientific Interest in green. The hatched area shows Natural England’s Impact Risk Zone. The full map legend is included.
Open the full-size map · Download the map (PDF)
Read our representation
Sunlight falling across a woodland path

Photograph by Dr Jackie Lighten.

What is proposed

This is not just a problem for Langdon Hills.

The plan calls it Policy SS18: Lower Langdon (4,000 homes) and Corringham Park Farm (1,000 homes).

Horndon-on-the-Hill, Stanford-le-Hope and Corringham would take the brunt: around 12,000 new residents on their doorstep, using their roads, their doctors and Basildon Hospital.

The A13 and many of our town roads are already at capacity. The Council’s own traffic model shows four A13 junctions at or over capacity with this plan, including the Stanford-le-Hope junction, and proposes no fix for any of them.

The Green Belt that keeps the three towns separate would be gone, and the traffic would run through them and on into Laindon and Basildon.

It would destroy the Green Belt that the Council’s own consultants said should not be developed on, and the farmland below the Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) that Natural England’s Impact Risk Zone exists to protect.

This is not another Green Belt dispute. It is a legal challenge to the whole evidence base for the site: flooding, wildlife, roads, water, health, housing needs and the Council’s own consultants’ advice. Each has been tested against the law in a rigorous analysis.

What we are asking for

We are asking for one policy to be removed.

We are not against the whole plan. We are asking for one policy to be removed, on the Council’s own evidence, when the plan is examined by a Planning Inspector in spring 2027.

  • Nearly 10,000 pages of evidence analysed
  • 75 published documents
  • 25+ independent analyses
  • 162 failings logged against the policy
  • Over 350 pages of reports and representation

The evidence is clear. This should not happen.

The policy is unsound and unjustified. Read the evidence

Consultation extended to 10 November 2026

You can still have your say.

The Council has extended the consultation to midnight on Tuesday 10 November 2026, after admitting an error in its assessment of the plan’s effect on protected wildlife sites. That assessment had not assessed Lower Langdon at all, as our representation showed. The replacement adds a few lines on Lower Langdon and changes none of its conclusions.

If you have not commented yet, there is still time. If you commented before 14 October, your comment stands and you do not need to send it again, but you can add a new one.

How to send your comment

Our own representation was filed on 14 October, by email and through the Council’s consultation portal. It asks the Planning Inspector to delete Policy SS18 and return the land to the Green Belt. It is published in full: both volumes on one page, with every reference linked, and the two PDFs as filed.

Read our representation
Brown hare
Brown hare
Adder
Adder
Barn owl
Barn owl
Badger
Badger
Cuckoo
Cuckoo
Lesser-spotted woodpecker
Lesser-spotted woodpecker

Illustrative wildlife photographs of species observed by Dr Lighten in the proposed build site.